Skip to main content
Animal welfare assessment and labelling

Effects of rearing system and environmental enrichment on production performance and welfare of slow-growing broilers

By October 22, 2026No Comments

Document type: scientific article published in Poultry Science

Authors: Deng HX, Wu LT, Zhang YB, Peng LL, Qi KL, Liu Y, Wang YN, Wang YJ, Shu G, Zhao XL

Abstract in French (translation): Effects of the rearing system and environmental enrichment on the production performance and welfare of slow-growing broiler chickens
Although consumers place great importance on healthy poultry products, research on productionsystems focused on the welfare of broiler chickensremains relatively scarce. This study aimed to explore a customized production system designed to improve the welfare of slow-growing broiler chickens. A total of 1,350 “Mountain Plum Blossom” broiler chickens, native to southwestern China, were randomly assigned to four production systems, each comprising three replicates per group and 90 chickens per replicate. These systems included: plastic-netting housing without environmental enrichment (PNR+NEE group), free-range housing without environmental enrichment (FR+NEE group), plastic-netting housing with environmental enrichment (PNR+EE group), and free-range housing with environmental enrichment (FR+EE group). The environmental enrichment implemented as part of this experiment included a sand bath, perches, ramps, platforms, and shelters. The results showed that broiler chickens raised in the PNR+NEE and PNR+EE groups had a higher final weight than those in the FR+NEE and FR+EE groups (P ≤ 0.05). However, the FR groups, with or without environmental enrichment, had a higher evisceration percentage as well as lower abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat index than the PNR groups without environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the FR groups, with or without environmental enrichment, had higher redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) values in the pectoral muscles than the PNR groups, with or without environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). Monounsaturated fatty acids, in both breast and thigh muscles, were higher in the FR+NEE and FR+EE groups than in the PNR+NEE and PNR+EE groups (P ≤ 0.05). Broiler chickens in the FR+EE and PNR+EE groups exhibited better welfare indicators, with lower plumage scores and shorter TI duration than those in the FR+NEE and PNR+NEE groups (P ≤ 0.05). It should be noted that the FR treatment increased serum dopamine levels compared to the PNR treatments, regardless of whether the chickens received environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, serum TNF-alpha levels were lower in the FR+EE and PNR+EE groups than in the FR+NEE and PNR+NEE groups (P ≤ 0.05). These results indicate that the production system with environmental enrichment optimized bot animal welfare , and meat quality, thereby providing a practical system for broiler production.

Preview: Although consumers place significant emphasis on healthy poultry products, research on welfare-oriented production systems for broilers remains relatively scarce. This study aimed to explore a tailored production system to improve the welfare of slow-growing broilers. Totally 1350 females of Mountain Plum Blossom chickens from Southwest China were randomly allocated into four production systems, each with three replicates per group and 90 chickens per replicate. The systems included plastic net rearing without environmental enrichment (PNR+NEE group), free-range rearing without environmental enrichment (FR+NEE group), plastic net rearing with environmental enrichment (PNR+EE group), and free-range with environmental enrichment (FR+EE group). The environmental enrichment provided in this experiment consisted of sand bathing pool, perches, ramps, platforms, and hide houses. Results showed that the broilers reared in the PNR+NEE and PNR+EE groups had higher final weight than those in the FR+NEE and FR+EE groups (P ≤ 0.05). However, the FR groups, with or without environmental enrichment, showed a higher eviscerated percentage and lower abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat index than the PNR groups without environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). Meanwhile, the FR groups, with or without environmental enrichment, showed higher redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) values in breast muscles than the PNR groups with or without environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). Monounsaturated fatty acids in both breast and thigh muscle from the FR+NEE and FR+EE groups were higher than those from the PNR+NEE and PNR+EE groups (P ≤ 0.05). Broilers in the FR+EE and PNR+EE groups had better welfare indicators, with lower feather scores and TI duration than the FR+NEE and PNR+NEE groups (P ≤ 0.05). Notably, FR treatment increased serum dopamine levels compared with PNR treatments, regardless of with or without environmental enrichment (P ≤ 0.05). In addition, serum TNF-alpha levels were lower in the FR+EE and PNR+EE groups than in the FR+NEE and PNR+NEE groups (P ≤ 0.05). These results indicated that the production system with environmental enrichment optimized both animal welfare and meat quality, providing a practical system for broiler production.

 

Poultry Science Cover
From the Poultry Science website