Skip to main content
Ethics-Sociology-Philosophy

Animal Rights and Legal Personhood

By March 14th 2024April 17th, 2024No Comments

Document type: pre-print synthesis published on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)

Author: Ethan Prall

  

Preview: Growing scientific evidence shows that vast numbers of nonhuman animals are sentient, and ethicists have argued that this means they have moral value. However, law's integration of individual animals as subjects with greater protection has been slow, despite the extreme threats that animals face today from human sources like climate change and industrial exploitation. Personhood has been heralded by some as a new legal status to protect animals, but the concept of "legal personhood" has been misunderstood. Most recently, New York's highest court decided in a case of first impression that an elephant named Happy is not a legal person and does not have a right to liberty-over two impassioned dissents. This Article offers a new synthesis of views regarding the moral status of animals, their "basic rights," and the relationship between basic rights and legal personhood. I argue that sentient animals have moral status that requires recognition of basic rights based on considerations of justice, which may lead to legal personhood over the long term. First, I argue that at least sentient animals have moral status and are subjects of justice who require greater legal protections. Then, I assess a new "bundle theory" of legal personhood that shows that personhood is a cluster concept composed of multiple "incidents." I argue that American law should better recognize basic rights to bodily integrity, liberty, and probably life for sentient animals, and should correct a mistaken view that personhood is the simple ability to hold rights. However, basic rights are only one incident of legal personhood, although recognizing them may help lead to animal personhood in time. To inform litigation, I also show how the bundle theory helps to explain the important disagreement between the judges in Happy's case. Finally, I suggest that both legislatures and judges can work to enhance animal legal rights, and perhaps eventually legal personhood, in the United States.

SSRN logo
From the SSRN website